What an interesting morning, yesterday, with a lot of political content!
Watching the Victoria Derbyshire programme on BBC was definitely different, for a start. We do not get to hear a lot around what and how debates are going in England in respect of the General Election, so yesterday morning was really just to catch up.
The main reason for carrying out this research, actually, was because of the Question Time programme on Thursday 11 May, broadcast from Edinburgh which did not really reflect the arguments I thought were being debated on the ground in Scotland and that disturbed me quite a bit.
I am disturbed because it would appear that realities facing the country are not being debated in any great depth. There appears to be some real confusion, especially among young people, about the whole political system, the different colours and outlooks of each party, misconception and misunderstanding about what historically happened and a general lack of understanding around why voting for what you believe is right is essential if you wish to get the best out of the governance of the country you live in.
Why do I mention governance? I have found myself on the largest learning curve of my life over the last ten years and a lot of what I have had to learn has been about structure and governance of everything from community groups, charities, social enterprises, educational structures, the list goes on.
The simple truth is although we all should have our say and take part in the running of our countries, the most effective and constructive way of ensuring the job gets done properly is to have a committee that will apply their management skills to taking what is being said and delegate action on behalf of everyone. Debates in parliament are meant to decide the best way forward for each action giving equal opportunity to as many points of view that are shared as possible.
That is what our government is supposed to do. They are not there to act independent of those voting for action etc., but to carry out what the majority decision is.
It is a serious bit of mis-communication that puts individuals, families, communities, living within a country at a lesser level and insists that action is being taken on behalf of everyone without consultation of everyone.
My intention, therefore, during the coming days, is to put forward what is actually being stated by each party’s manifesto in a way, hopefully, that will be plain speech to everyone. I will not only put forward the manifesto points (not the whole manifesto – too long), but I will also record what has been achieved by each party to date in terms of benefit, or non-benefit to the people of the UK as a whole from recent (2010 onwards), previous manifesto promises. Please note that I cannot eliminate my viewpoint totally from what I write, however, I will put both sides of the argument as clearly as I can.
The reason I am doing this is not to benefit any particular party but to inform the younger generation properly because they need to make their minds up on real facts, not disinformation or un-clear communication.
I would urge anyone who has a question to comment or get in touch if they think I can answer or someone else reading can answer. I also welcome all feedback because, it keeps everything real, up-front, accountable and honest.
To start with, some points that came up during my research yesterday:
There was a lot of discussion around the Conservative sound-bite about preserving worker’s rights, in fact making them stronger, one point put across several times was the fact that the Conservative Government are introducing a right for carers to take unpaid leave to care for family members etc.
I have to say, from my own personal viewpoint, this is a sound-bite because:
- In 2010 the Conservatives wanted to re-write the Human Rights Act from a UK perspective, partly because they did not understand the European Convention on Human Rights. This party is now planning to make sure the European Convention is complied with fully, which shows that they did not originally understand the European Convention.
- Why would a Conservative Government seek to scrap paternity leave because, in their words, it was not required, then decide that unpaid leave would be given to those caring for a family member. Is there any sense there?
- Why unpaid leave? Are family members worth less? What is the difference between caring for a child and caring for an older family member. You get child benefit for caring for a child. This job is to be unpaid, need I say more?
- If the Conservatives truly believe in strong workers’ rights, why have they been working against this as a party since 2010?
- The Conservative Government have, I have been told, been advised that their Government has actually breached the UN Convention on Human Rights, never mind the EU Convention on Human Rights which came after the UN Convention, with their actions in this country.
I have found, throughout my 33 years’ voting experience, that political parties of every persuasion will create sound-bites in order to get votes. The sad thing is that politicians don’t realise that not everybody follows politics, and this type of electioneering tradition can cause total confusion. At a time where it is essential that as many as possible vote, it is probably extremely unhelpful to any political case to enter into this type of electioneering.
One more point, every government, since I was a young girl, have kept salaries and budgets in public services including police, education and health service low compared with their spending on war and weapons!!
Lastly, one thing we all do from time to time we and our governments blame others for the course we choose. That is not going to solve anything is it!
Don’t we all have to take responsibility for making our communities, the places we live in the best they can be responsibly?
AFTER ALL THE PEOPLE ARE THE GOVERNMENT!!