Scotland Leased to the Scots

December 9, 2017

By The Grouse Beater - Scotland

Imposing an unequal Treaty on a neighbour nation in which that nation will always be overpowered by the parliamentary votes and self-serving agenda of the dominant nation is normally described as governing a colony.

In Scotland’s case, Scotland is leased to the Scots.

The majority of key powers are retained by the UK Parliament which in the main serves England first, colonies second, usually serving them badly. All Scotland’s wealth goes south, a tiny portion sent back in case we starve, in which case we’d be no use to our colonial masters at all. The tragic political dog’s dinner that is Northern Ireland is a case in point, Gibraltar another. Scotland gets short shrift but a bit more attention because it’s joined onto England and shouts a lot. Wales is too close to London to be a threat.

Foreign policy, armaments, avoiding wars, banking, trade deals and treaties, tariffs, broadcasting and cable provision, membership of the United Nations are only a few of the important powers not given to Scotland. By any yardstick that makes us a colony.

The only concessions England made under the Act of Union – and how it must regret it – was taking on all the United Kingdom’s debt in the event of a split. That was the boulder chained to its ankle in return for controlling all financial powers. To compensate they take all Scotland earns and steal Scotland’s oil.

Colonies are not for consulting


Colonies are not considered in the calculation of consequences. Pulling out of Europe on the vote of middle-England racism is a case in point, a pertinent one.

The flitting is potentially lethal to the economies of Scotland, Wales, and Northern Ireland, as well as tearing up all the Treaties NI with the Republic, and Gibraltar too. But Theresa May and her empire loyalists plough on regardless.

Only a minority party in NI has been consulted, the DUP, not the NI Assembly. Readers will recall the Tory MP Neil Hamilton receiving brown envelopes from Mohamed al-Fayed who owned Harrods. That was sleaze, but chicken feed to today’s £2 billion promised to the DUP for services rendered.  The Tories handed the proverbial brown envelope to the DUP to keep themselves in power. Sleazy? – you bet it is. That isn’t a government  strong and stable. That’s a democracy in the last throes of life.

Our neighbours in the south

Scotland cannot remedy its ills nor progress unless released from the governance of an essentially reckless, corrupt neighbour, now openly antagonistic and repressive.

As Westminster uses Brexit to recover powers it gave to Scotland, and scandals are heaped one upon another, more and more English are realising something is rotten in the state of merry Britain. Scotland is beginning to understand it cannot resist the worst of English extremism unless it has the internal powers to halt unwanted incursions.

Unionists like to react to that statement with mock shock and surprise and quite a lot of ridicule. Where, how are you oppressed, they say? This was the British question put to Gandhi and his India. Imperialists always see themselves as benign, bringing civilisation to the natives who really ought to be grateful.

The colonial assumes the natives are inferior. They argued without imperialist England India would fall into anarchy ruled by corrupt maharajas. And indeed, that’s exemplifies the essential attitude unionist against pro-independence supporters. Only that isn’t the truth. English presence, aided by Scots in their employment or merchants trading with India, ensured famine was rife, poverty accepted as part of the natural order of things, and the quelling of mass protest silenced by rifle fire. All India’s resources, gold and jewels too, (see Queen Elizabeth’s crown) went to England, the usual one-way journey.

Anti-independence supporters – the ones who belittle democrats as ‘separatists’ – keep repeating the lie that Scotland is too poor to survive on its own. They do not mention how much of its wealth and resources they are removing from Scotland to justify that fabrication, in the same way England got very rich on the back of owning India.

Juggling with globalisation.

Globalisation has been with us a very long time. It’s not a new concept, not as I understand it. If we interpret globalisation to mean international integration it began long before somebody used coinage to create capitalism.

When you look at it, silk roads dating back to the pre-Christian times were an extensive form of globalization. Marco Polo opening up China to the west and a huge trading market, mostly in one direction, the west.  China is doing that today, dominating western industry’s profit margins, and owning billions of the west’s debts keeping us tied to their friendship no matter what we dislike about their lack of civil rights.

If you want to make a lot of money you do what James Dyson has done, and other major companies before him. You create products that sell in the biggest market in the world, China, and you manufacture them in China at cheap labour rates so that you can sell the same products in the west at great profit. That too, is a kind of colonisation.

“All for ourselves, nothing for other people.” Adam Smith

The rise of industrial state capitalism has changed the scale and character of globalization, and in its turn the relationship England with Scotland.

It is fair to argue that before 1945, the advanced capitalist countries practised a kind of open imperialism. They colonized weaker countries. They did it by strength of navy, army and financial muscle.

They legitimised oppression by imposing unequal treaties on them. By any analysis this is creating a colony – they occupied parts of territories through “leasing,” deprived them of the right to set taxes, tariffs, or negotiate with other nations. Does that sound familiar?

Since 1945 we have seen a strong worldwide reaction against colonisation with the advent of nation states, well over a hundred, some by peaceful means, the ballot box, and some by rebellion, armed insurrection. I believe Scotland’s political awakening in the late twentieth century, and now in fierce, combative action, is a manifestation of the desire to wrestle back control of our nation’s rights and destiny from the people who have profited from globalisation. In our case it’s our neighbour at our expense.

Together with other nations, particularly Latin American countries sick of American interference in their  economies and governments, Catalonia too in its own way, we’ve seen the emergence of a global revolt that rejects naked imperialism. There’s been a continuous process of de-colonialisation over the last decades and, once sovereignty is regain in full, membership of the United Nations, which is based upon the principle of one-country-one-vote.

The disaster upon us

Unfortunately, what are seeing now in England’s callous dumping of European unity is a rollback of the sovereignty that the post-colonial countries enjoyed. Scotland has yet to enjoy a post-colonial existence.

A plethora of trade agreements since the Nineties has eroded sovereignty, (mostly made in the US’s favour) and English see that as much as Scots do but confuse it with their inherent dislike of Johnny Foreigner. English Exceptionalism feels it has the right to tell Europeans what they should do, but not the other way around.

Furthermore, our lives are shaped and dictated by multi-national corporations, organisations that used to be self-contained but that now hold great economic power. They see themselves as above the law and natural justice. They move their money around continents and pay next to no tax. This is an unprecedented extension of corporate power.

Scotland laughed at Reagan’s old faker antics but was thoroughly kicked around by Thatcher’s interpretation of survival only of the fittest. Now we see major corporations driving government policy – big business telling the Scottish population not to vote for self-governance but to bow to their bought and paid for puppets, the Tory and Labour party who pander to their interests, many of whom retire onto their board of directors.

Good? It’s nearly all bad

We see the terrible effects of neo-liberal economics – the emphasis on individuality and the creed of me-first rather than collective identity. (Collective identity is what the SNP is good at.) The ill and vulnerable are told to work, then see shrinkage of the welfare state remove their lifebelt to avoid the poverty trap. Those in work are told their job stacking shelves or as a bank teller is redundant so go switch mid-life to investment banking or computer software expertise.

Unless we take our nation’s destiny into our hands and our place in the United Nations too long delayed, unless we take control of the mechanisms that redistribute wealth, we will always be the loser who is never compensated. We will pay dearly for leasing our own land.

Daniel Defoe said, “In this Union here there are Lands and People added to the English empire.” He knew what he was talking about, a statement fit for The Infamous Ledger.

Further reading:

The scale of this new globalized  world is revealed in the 2013 World Investment Report of the United Nations Commission on Trade and Development. 80 percent of global trade is run by transnational corporations, accounting for only 20 percent of jobs worldwide.


Last Essay

Unless Armageddon looms large, this is the last political essay this side of 2018. Next year sees the fourth year of this essay site. It’s been an interesting journey reaching almost 30,000 regular readers a month worldwide, and an average of 22,000 impressions a day. Though I don’t have millions of followers I delight in having over 11,000 likes. When I began I wondered what it was I had to say that would outlast a month’s articles. Now and again I see some influence on readers who are keen to learn, as I am from them, and who are open minded. Meanwhile I’m ruining my eyesight composing essays at night, and I think I’ve acquired a permanently numb bum from all this sedentary work. If next year doesn’t see a second referendum on Scotland’s rights I might have to buy a guide dog and a wheelchair.

Personally, I hate Christmas, the whole tawdriness of it. But I’ll survive.

You can follow  Grouse Beater on twitter at @Grouse_Beater       or at the webpage Grouse Beater

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *